Why Race Matters in International Relations

  • Citation: Zvobgo, Kelebogile, and Meredith Loken. “Why Race Matters in International Relations.” Foreign Policy, June 19, 2020.
    • Topics:
    • Reframing IR and Development
    • Keywords:
    • race
    • international relations
    • dominant frameworks
    • Eurocentrism
    • Western dominance

Race is not a perspective on international relations; it is a central organizing feature of world politics. Anti-Japanese racism guided and sustained U.S. engagement in World War II, and broader anti-Asian sentiment influenced the development and structure of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. During the Cold War, racism and anti-communism were inextricably linked in the containment strategy that defined Washington’s approach to Africa, Asia, Central America, the Caribbean, and South America. And today race shapes threat perception and responses to violent extremism, inside and outside the “war on terror.” Yet mainstream international relations (IR) scholarship denies race as essential to understanding the world, to the cost of the field’s integrity.

Related Resources

  • Kazakhstan as a Humanitarian Aid Donor

    Insebayeva, Nafissa. 2022. “Kazakhstan as a Humanitarian Aid Donor.” Modernity, Development and Decolonization of Knowledge in Central Asia, 47–64.

    • Authors with Diverse Backgrounds
    Keywords: Humanitarian aid, Development aid, UNDP, Central Asia, Law drafting, Domestic context
  • From ‘Social Evils’ to ‘Human Beings’: Vietnam’s LGBT Movement and the Politics of Recognition

    Phuong, Pham Quynh. 2022. “From ‘Social Evils’ to ‘Human Beings’: Vietnam’s LGBT Movement and the Politics of Recognition.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 41 (3): 422–39.

    • Open Source Results
    • Authors with Diverse Backgrounds