The Case for Security Sector Reform in Zimbabwe

  • Citation: Chityo, Knox. “The Case for Security Sector Reform in Zimbabwe.” Royal United Services Institute, September 2009, 1–52.
    • Topics:
    • Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding
    • Keywords:
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
    • Zimbabwe
    • SSR
    • military operations
    • politics
    • international engagement
    • UK

This paper assesses the security sector’s role in Zimbabwe and identifies key areas for reform. Will the security sector be a constructive partner in Zimbabwe’s recovery? Or will it be a spoiler, bringing the nation back to the brink? The author makes four main propositions: first, that Zimbabwe needs a National Defence and Security Strategy based on a ‘security plus’ ideal, which integrates traditional defence policy with ‘people-centered’ security. Second, that Security Sector Reform is a major component of the National Defence and Security Strategy. Third, that Security Sector Reform in Zimbabwe should be appropriate to the local context, and led by the Zimbabwean people in a consultative process. Fourth, that the international community, including the United Kingdom, has a role to play and that ‘smart security’ partnerships are of great value. The paper acknowledges that political will is a prerequisite for successful reform, but argues that it cannot wait until the country is stabilised. Security Sector Reform must begin now.

Related Resources

  • Criminal Justice, Artificial Intelligence Systems, and Human Rights

    Završnik, Aleš. “Criminal Justice, Artificial Intelligence Systems, and Human Rights.” ERA Forum 20, no. 4 (March 1, 2020): 567–83.

    • Authors with Diverse Backgrounds
    Keywords: Criminal Justice, Human Rights, Automation, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Fair Trial
  • Racial, Skin Tone, and Sex Disparities in Automated Proctoring Software

    Yoder-Himes, Deborah R., Alina Asif, Kaelin Kinney, Tiffany J. Brandt, Rhiannon E. Cecil, Paul R. Himes, Cara Cashon, Rachel M. P. Hopp, and Edna Ross. “Racial, Skin Tone, and Sex Disparities in Automated Proctoring Software.” Frontiers in Education 7 (September 20, 2022).

    • Authors with Diverse Backgrounds