Each year billions of US-dollars of humanitarian assistance are mobilised in response to man-made emergencies and natural disasters. Yet, rigorous evidence for how best to intervene remains scant. This dearth reflects that rigorous impact evaluations of humanitarian assistance pose major methodological, practical and ethical challenges. While theory-based impact evaluations can crucially inform humanitarian programming, popular methods, such as orthodox RCTs, are less suitable. Instead, factorial designs and quasi-experimental designs can be ethical and robust, answering questions about how to improve the delivery of assistance. We argue that it helps to be prepared, planning impact evaluations before the onset of emergencies.
Can Rigorous Impact Evaluations Improve Humanitarian Assistance?
Related Resources
-
From ‘Social Evils’ to ‘Human Beings’: Vietnam’s LGBT Movement and the Politics of Recognition
Phuong, Pham Quynh. 2022. “From ‘Social Evils’ to ‘Human Beings’: Vietnam’s LGBT Movement and the Politics of Recognition.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 41 (3): 422–39.
- Open Source Results
- Authors with Diverse Backgrounds
-
Silent Struggles: Women Education Leaders’ Agency for Peacebuilding in Islamic Schools in Post-Conflict Aceh
Lopes Cardozo, Mieke T.A., Rizki Amalia Affiat, Faryaal Zaman, Maida Irawani, and Eka Srimulyani. 2022. “Silent Struggles: Women Education Leaders’ Agency for Peacebuilding in Islamic Schools in Post-Conflict Aceh.” Journal of Peace Education 19 (2): 158–81.
- Open Source Results
- Authors with Diverse Backgrounds