How do political parties govern in consociational or power-sharing systems built on sectarian representation in the Middle East? And how do they cooperate or clash on contentious policy issues? This chapter explores the key characteristics of Lebanon’s political parties and their behaviour in the small polity’s sectarian-based model of politics. It argues that political parties constitute key conduits for perpetuating and reproducing Lebanon’s politics of sectarianism, which crystallises group identities and enshrines antagonistic governance. To examine some of the ways through which Lebanon’s political parties have nurtured divided loyalties and created gridlock in governance, we examine political parties’ polarised stances and behaviour in the context of Syria’s neighbouring war since 2011. By cementing divisive agendas serving various geostrategic interests, political parties enact and deploy power at the expense of programmatic agendas and national policies.
Related Resources
-
America’s Arctic Moment: Great Power Competition in the Arctic to 2050
Williams, Ian, Heather A. Conley, Nikos Tsafos, and Matthew Melino. “America’s Arctic Moment: Great Power Competition in the Arctic to 2050,” March 30, 2020.
- Open Source Results
- Authors with Diverse Backgrounds
-
Indonesia’s Great-Power Management in the Indo-Pacific: The Balancing Behavior of a ‘Dove State'
Shekhar, Vibhanshu. “Indonesia’s Great-Power Management in the Indo-Pacific: The Balancing Behavior of a ‘Dove State.’” Asia Policy 17, no. 4 (2022): 123–49.
- Authors with Diverse Backgrounds