Democratic and autocratic states routinely violate their international agreements protecting human rights. Scholars typically link ratification and compliance behavior theoretically but test their models separately; however, if the behaviors are jointly determined then we should treat them that way empirically. We consider how domestic judiciaries influence the joint choice to ratify and comply with international human rights regimes. Using data on the ratification status of states under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), states’ torture practices, and a series of measures of judicial effectiveness, we examine whether legal institutions are likely to constrain state behavior and by implication raise the costs of ratification.
Related Resources
-
Implications of Cryptocurrency Energy Usage on Climate Change
Zhang, Dongna, Xihui Haviour Chen, Chi Keung Lau, and Bing Xu. 2023. “Implications of Cryptocurrency Energy Usage on Climate Change.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 187: 122219.
- Authors with Diverse Backgrounds
-
How Much Does Racial Bias Affect Mortgage Lending? Evidence from Human and Algorithmic Credit Decisions
Bhutta, Neil and Hizmo, Aurel and Ringo, Daniel. 2022. “How Much Does Racial Bias Affect Mortgage Lending? Evidence from Human and Algorithmic Credit Decisions.” FEDS Working Paper No. 2022-67, SSRN
- Open Source Results
- Authors with Diverse Backgrounds