When a fundamentalist Islamic organization called the Taliban came to power in Afghanistan in 1996, the Western world (and especially the Western media) immediately denounced the Taliban’s policies concerning Afghan women. The Taliban, decrying Western interference, quickly defended themselves by insisting that their treatment of women stems from cultural and religious traditions. This tug-of-war continues today because both the West and the Taliban rely on simplistic definitions of women’s human rights and culture in constructing their arguments. Thus, the issue of Afghan women’s human rights is entangled in a web between those who insist upon the existence of universal human rights standards and those who declare that human rights are contingent upon the particular culture of a given society. This Note utilizes feminist theory and practice to create an alternative to the either/or discourse put forth by the proponents of universalism and relativism. It then applies this alternative to an Afghan woman’s asylum claim in order to enable an asylum decision informed by both universalism and relativism, and to produce an outcome that is not limited by either.
Related Resources
-
America’s Arctic Moment: Great Power Competition in the Arctic to 2050
Williams, Ian, Heather A. Conley, Nikos Tsafos, and Matthew Melino. “America’s Arctic Moment: Great Power Competition in the Arctic to 2050,” March 30, 2020.
- Open Source Results
- Authors with Diverse Backgrounds
-
Indonesia’s Great-Power Management in the Indo-Pacific: The Balancing Behavior of a ‘Dove State'
Shekhar, Vibhanshu. “Indonesia’s Great-Power Management in the Indo-Pacific: The Balancing Behavior of a ‘Dove State.’” Asia Policy 17, no. 4 (2022): 123–49.
- Authors with Diverse Backgrounds