Trade policy is among the EU’s most significant capabilities in promoting values including human rights. Yet trade policy and the EU’s values-based foreign policy are often in tension. Scholarship on the social dimension of trade policy has emphasized the tension between values and the EU’s commercial interests. Human rights and conditionality clauses have not been the focus of analysis, yet conditionality is one of the EU’s most visible links between the trade agenda and its values-based foreign policy. Analyzing the EU’s decision-making in negotiating human rights conditionality, this paper employs the EU–Singapore free trade agreement and its negotiation as an in-depth single case study. The tension between commercial interests and values results in decision-makers promoting incoherent interests. We argue that organizationally defined preferences and issue salience circumscribed the Parliament’s impact on decision-making, resulting in concessions on human rights conditionality with Singapore.
Related Resources
-
Post-Soviet Women: New Challenges and Ways to Empowerment
Ann-Mari Sätre, Yulia Gradskova, and Vladislava Vladimirova, eds. Post-Soviet Women: New Challenges and Ways to Empowerment. Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 2023.
- Authors with Diverse Backgrounds
-
Laboratory of Socialist Development: Cold War Politics and Decolonization in Soviet Tajikistan
Kalinovsky, Artemy M. Laboratory of Socialist Development: Cold War Politics and Decolonization in Soviet Tajikistan. Cornell University Press, 2018.