Increasing Operational Effectiveness in UN Peacekeeping: Toward a Gender-Balanced Force

  • Citation: Bridges, Donna, and Debbie Horsfall. “Increasing Operational Effectiveness in UN Peacekeeping: Toward a Gender-Balanced Force.” Armed Forces and Society 36, no. 1 (2009).
    • Topics:
    • Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding
    • Keywords:
    • United Nations
    • peacekeeping
    • gender
    • armed forces
    • female service personnel

In this article, the authors argue that an increased percentage of female military personnel on UN peacekeeping operations is beneficial to operational effectiveness. They establish a case for a greater proportion of female service personnel that is based on three main premises: (1) a force adequately representative of female service personnel in peacekeeping operations will combat sexual misconduct perpetrated by some male soldiers, (2) peacekeeping is a task of great consequence and is best served by a force representative of both genders, (3) a greater proportion of female military personnel engenders trust and improves the reputation of peacekeepers among local populations. Literature reviews, including media reviews, research, and policy reports compiled by the Australian Defence Force (ADF), other Western militaries, and the United Nations, inform the above assertions and are augmented by research data from interviews with female personnel from the ADF.

Related Resources

  • Eating-Disordered Behavior among Male and Female College Students in Iran

    Sahlan, Reza N., Fatemeh Taravatrooy, Virginia Quick, and Jonathan M. Mond. 2020. “Eating-Disordered Behavior among Male and Female College Students in Iran.” Eating Behaviors 37: 101378.

    • Open Source Results
    • Authors with Diverse Backgrounds
    Keywords: eating disorder behaviour, Iran, gender differences, college students, binge eating
  • Suicidality in Autistic Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    O'Halloran, Laura, Phillip Coey, and Charlotte Emma Wilson. “Suicidality in Autistic Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Clinical Psychology Review 93 (2022): 102144.

    • Open Source Results
    • Authors with Diverse Backgrounds