“Indigenous peoples” as an international legal concept has been justified by particular histories in states formed by European colonial settlement, but is increasingly applied globally, prompting sharp protests and calls for a narrow definition by several Asian states. This article proposes broader justifications and a flexible, but focused, definition. It makes a constructivist argument that such global concepts are not sharply defined but are dynamic abstractions, continuously drawing from and shaping the diverse categories and circumstances of different societies and institutions.
"Indigenous Peoples" in International Law: A Constructivist Approach to the Asian Controversy
Related Resources
-
Criminal Justice, Artificial Intelligence Systems, and Human Rights
Završnik, Aleš. “Criminal Justice, Artificial Intelligence Systems, and Human Rights.” ERA Forum 20, no. 4 (March 1, 2020): 567–83.
- Authors with Diverse Backgrounds
-
Racial, Skin Tone, and Sex Disparities in Automated Proctoring Software
Yoder-Himes, Deborah R., Alina Asif, Kaelin Kinney, Tiffany J. Brandt, Rhiannon E. Cecil, Paul R. Himes, Cara Cashon, Rachel M. P. Hopp, and Edna Ross. “Racial, Skin Tone, and Sex Disparities in Automated Proctoring Software.” Frontiers in Education 7 (September 20, 2022).
- Authors with Diverse Backgrounds