Probabilistic Causality, Selection Bias, and the Logic of the Democratic Peace

  • Citation: Slantchev, Branislav L., Anna Alexandrova, and Erik Gartzke. "Probabilistic Causality, Selection Bias, and the Logic of the Democratic Peace." American Political Science Review 99.03 (2005): 459-462.
    • Topics:
    • IR Theories
    • Keywords:
    • signaling theory
    • probabilistic theories
    • selection bias
    • democratic peace

Rosato (2003) claims to have discredited democratic peace theories. However, the methodological approach adopted by the study cannot reliably generate the conclusions espoused by the author. Rosato seems to misunderstand the probabilistic nature of most arguments about democratic peace and ignores issues that an appropriate research design should account for. Further, the study’s use of case studies and data sets without attention to selection-bias produces examples that actually support theories it seeks to undermine. These problems place in doubt the article’s findings.

Related Resources

  • Kazakhstan as a Humanitarian Aid Donor

    Insebayeva, Nafissa. 2022. “Kazakhstan as a Humanitarian Aid Donor.” Modernity, Development and Decolonization of Knowledge in Central Asia, 47–64.

    • Authors with Diverse Backgrounds
    Keywords: Humanitarian aid, Development aid, UNDP, Central Asia, Law drafting, Domestic context
  • From ‘Social Evils’ to ‘Human Beings’: Vietnam’s LGBT Movement and the Politics of Recognition

    Phuong, Pham Quynh. 2022. “From ‘Social Evils’ to ‘Human Beings’: Vietnam’s LGBT Movement and the Politics of Recognition.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 41 (3): 422–39.

    • Open Source Results
    • Authors with Diverse Backgrounds