Probabilistic Causality, Selection Bias, and the Logic of the Democratic Peace

  • Citation: Slantchev, Branislav L., Anna Alexandrova, and Erik Gartzke. "Probabilistic Causality, Selection Bias, and the Logic of the Democratic Peace." American Political Science Review 99.03 (2005): 459-462.
    • Topics:
    • IR Theories
    • Keywords:
    • signaling theory
    • probabilistic theories
    • selection bias
    • democratic peace

Rosato (2003) claims to have discredited democratic peace theories. However, the methodological approach adopted by the study cannot reliably generate the conclusions espoused by the author. Rosato seems to misunderstand the probabilistic nature of most arguments about democratic peace and ignores issues that an appropriate research design should account for. Further, the study’s use of case studies and data sets without attention to selection-bias produces examples that actually support theories it seeks to undermine. These problems place in doubt the article’s findings.

Related Resources

  • Alternative Narratives for Arms Control

    Moodie, Amanda, and Michael Moodie. “Alternative Narratives for Arms Control.” The Nonproliferation Review 17, no. 2 (2010): 301–21.

    • Authors with Diverse Backgrounds
    Keywords: arms control, disarmament, Non-Aligned Movement, small arms, treaty regimes, humanitarian action
  • Women in Arms Control: Time for a Gender Turn?

    Dwan, Renata. “Women in Arms Control: Time for a Gender Turn?” Arms Control Today 49, no. 8 (October 2019): 6–11.

    • Open Source Results
    • Authors with Diverse Backgrounds