Primed for Violence: The Role of Gender Inequality in Predicting Internal Conflict
Categories: Conflict Prevention
Sub-Categories: Early Warning, Human Development
Region: No Region
Year: 2005
Citation: Caprioli, M. "Primed for Violence: The Role of Gender
Inequality in Predicting Internal Conflict." International Studies Quarterly 49 (2005): 161-178.
Sub-Categories: Early Warning, Human Development
Region: No Region
Year: 2005
Citation: Caprioli, M. "Primed for Violence: The Role of Gender Inequality in Predicting Internal Conflict." International Studies Quarterly 49 (2005): 161-178.
Abstract
We know, most notably through Ted Gurr’s research, that ethnic discrimination
can lead to ethnopolitical rebellion–intrastate conflict. I seek
to discover what impact, if any, gender inequality has on intrastate con-
flict. Although democratic peace scholars and others highlight the role
of peaceful domestic behavior in predicting state behavior, many scholars
have argued that a domestic environment of inequality and violenceFstructural
and cultural violenceFresults in a greater likelihood
of violence at the state and the international level. This project contributes
to this line of inquiry and further tests the grievance theory of
intrastate conflict by examining the norms of violence that facilitate a call
to arms. And in many ways, I provide an alternative explanation for the
significance of some of the typical economic measuresFthe greed theoryFbased
on the link between discrimination, inequality, and violence.
I test whether states characterized by higher levels of gender inequality
are more likely to experience intrastate conflict. Ultimately, the basic
link between gender inequality and intrastate conflict is con-
firmedFstates characterized by gender inequality are more likely to
experience intrastate conflict, 1960–2001.